Background. Hospitalization and intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibi
otics are the standard of care for all febrile neutropenic patients wi
th cancer. Recent work suggests that a low-risk population exists who
might benefit from an alternate approach. Methods. A prospective rando
mized clinical trial was performed comparing oral ciprofloxacin 750 mg
plus clindamycin 600 mg every 8 hours with IV aztreonam 2 g plus clin
damycin 600 mg every 8 hours for the empiric outpatient treatment of f
ebrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic patients with cancer. Results.
The oral regimen cured 35 of 40 episodes (88% response rate), whereas
the IV regimen cured 41 of 43 episodes (95% response rate, P = 0.19).
Although the cost of the oral regimen was significantly less than tha
t of the IV regimen (P < 0.0001), it was associated with significant r
enal toxicity (P < 0.05), which led to early termination of the study.
Overall, combining its safety and efficacy, the IV regimen was superi
or (P = 0.03). Conclusions. This prospective study suggested that outp
atient antibiotic therapy for febrile episodes in low-risk neutropenic
patients with cancer is safe and effective. Better oral regimens are
needed.