When subjects perform a distractor task before and after every item on
a list, recall of the last item is much higher than recall of items f
rom the middle of the list. Koppenaal and Glanzer (1990) have shown th
at this long-term recency effect can be eliminated by using, after the
last item, a distractor task different from that used elsewhere on th
e list. They interpreted this finding as evidence in favor of a short-
term-store account of long-term recency effects. This account is chall
enged by the results reported here. Practice either on the task or on
time-sharing between the task and list items had little impact on the
recency effect. Also, substantial recency effects were found when a di
fferent distractor task occurred after every list position. Thus, it i
s not true that long-term recency effects are found only when subjects
have an opportunity to adapt to the distractor task. Our results are
not consistent with a short-term-store account of recency effects.