Ha. Capell et al., 2ND LINE (DISEASE-MODIFYING) TREATMENT IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - WHICH DRUG FOR WHICH PATIENT, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 52(6), 1993, pp. 423-428
Objectives-The objectives were to assess (a) the comparative merits of
commonly used disease modifying drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) and (b) the influence of age, gender, and disease durat
ion on the outcome of treatment. Methods-Collected analysis (meta-anal
ysis) was performed on results obtained during the first year of treat
ment in 1140 patients with RA treated with gold, penicillamine, sulpha
salazine, or auranofin from a single centre. Results-Gold, penicillami
ne, and sulphasalazine performed similarly, with about 60% of patients
continuing to receive each of these drugs for at least one year. Neit
her gender nor age had an influence on the response to treatment, but
patients with a longer disease duration showed a greater tendency to s
top treatment. The median percentage improvement was 33% in visual ana
logue pain score and 50% in erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Conclusion
s-Routine use of these drugs should at least equal these results. Any
new drug should either be substantially less toxic or at least as effi
cacious.