URINE NEOPTERIN AS A PARAMETER OF DISEASE-ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - COMPARISONS WITH SERUM SIL-2R AND ANTIBODIES TO DSDNA, ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE, AND PLASMA-C3, C4, AND PLASMA-C3 DEGRADATION PRODUCTS
Kl. Lim et al., URINE NEOPTERIN AS A PARAMETER OF DISEASE-ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS - COMPARISONS WITH SERUM SIL-2R AND ANTIBODIES TO DSDNA, ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION-RATE, AND PLASMA-C3, C4, AND PLASMA-C3 DEGRADATION PRODUCTS, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 52(6), 1993, pp. 429-435
Objectives-To investigate urine neopterin as a parameter of disease ac
tivity in an unselected group of patients with systemic lupus erythema
tosus (SLE) and to study the relation between urine neopterin and cert
ain patterns of organ disease and differing drug regimens in the treat
ment of SLE. Methods-Neopterin was determined by high performance liqu
id chromatography in 115 early morning urine samples from 68 patients
with SLE. Serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) and antibodies
to double stranded DNA (dsDNA) were determined by enzyme linked immun
osorbent assay (ELISA), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),
plasma C3, C4, and C3 degradation products (C3dg) were measured in cor
responding blood samples. Disease activity was scored using the Britis
h Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. Results-Urine neopterin
was significantly increased in patients with active and inactive SLE c
ompared with the control group and was significantly higher in patient
s with active than in those with inactive SLE. Urine neopterin did not
distinguish between subsets of patients with SLE with particular patt
erns of organ disease, as defined by the BILAG index, nor was its leve
l primarily influenced by differing drug regimens. Levels of serum sIL
-2R, antibodies to dsDNA, the ESR, and plasma C3, C4, and C3dg were al
so significantly different between the patients with active and inacti
ve SLE. Unlike urine neopterin there was considerable overlap in the v
alues of these parameters between the two activity groups. Highly sign
ificant correlations found between urine neopterin and serum sIL-2R, E
SR, and plasma C3, C4, and C3dg suggest the close association of neopt
erin with clinical activity in SLE. Multivariate logistic regression a
nalysis showed that urine neopterin >300 mumol/mol creatinine was a hi
ghly significant predictor of disease activity with an odds ratio of 3
.51. Conclusions-Determination of urine neopterin, a non-invasive, rel
atively simple and inexpensive measurement, appears to be the best par
ameter for assessing and monitoring disease activity and treatment in
patients with SLE.