Demand for susceptibility testing of anaerobes has increased, but no c
onsensus on procedure and interpretation has been achieved. The need f
or reliable methods for testing anaerobic bacteria extends from small
hospital laboratories to large research centers. Agar dilution testing
is too costly and labor intensive for many clinical laboratories. Mic
robroth dilution is more convenient; however, some fastidious anaerobe
s do not grow well enough in this system, and the choice of antimicrob
ial agents may not reflect the hospital formulary. Disapproval of the
broth disk elution system leaves fewer options open to clinical labora
tories and emphasizes the need for more convenient and reliable techni
ques. Some newer methods are undergoing evaluation. Variables in susce
ptibility testing of anaerobes include the media and methods used, org
anisms chosen, breakpoints chosen, and endpoint determination. This la
tter variable is probably the most problematic since no endpoint based
on interaction of organism and antimicrobial agent rather than on sub
jective observation has been defined. Also, clustering of MICs around
the breakpoint may lead to significant variability in reported methods
. A more accurate MIC measurement is needed. Adherence of laboratories
to approved methods and careful reporting of methods and the interpre
tive breakpoints would facilitate interlaboratory comparisons and the
identification of emerging resistance.