Since the middle of the eighties owners of animals increasingly claime
d compensation from balloon pilots. They asserted, that their animals
got restless due to strange optical and acoustical stimuli caused by l
ow altitude crossing of hot-air balloons and were damaged while trying
to get out of the way or to escape. Very low altitude ''Contour cross
ing'' of hot-air balloons, mainly forming the basis of complaints, is
only left possible in a limited degree in Germany since the air traffi
c regulations were changed to a higher minimum safety altitude (Air Tr
affic Act, LuftVO, version of March 21, 1995) and the violating balloo
n pilot may be disciplined. The paper is dealing with the principle of
hot-air ballooning, with the feasibility of the pilot to avoid and re
strict damages, with the possibilities to assign damages to a potentia
l cause and with the legal basis.