George Williams proposed in 1957 that menopause evolved because, late
in life, women have more to gain from child care than from continued f
ertility. I develop here a quantitative model of this idea in order to
determine whether the proposed benefit is in fact larger than the cos
t. To make this work possible, I introduce an age-structured theory of
kin selection that allows for a time delay between an act of altruism
and the benefit it provides. Using this theory, I show that in age-st
ructured populations, conventional inclusive fitness calculations are
justified for effects on fertility only when either the population is
stationary or there is no delay between cost and benefit. For effects
on mortality, conventional calculations also require that donor and re
cipient be affected at the same age. I then introduce two versions of
Williams' idea. Model I assumes that menopause is maintained because i
t reduces the risk of mortality during childbirth, thus increasing the
provision of parental care. The analysis demonstrates that this model
is incapable of accounting for menopause. Model II assumes that menop
ause facilitates parental care by reducing the time during which a wom
an is partially incapacitated by the demands of pregnancy and infant c
are. This model could not be rejected. However, a definitive test will
require parameter estimates that are not yet available.