This paper replicates standard consumption function tests of Ricardian
equivalence using series generated from a model which nests Ricardian
equivalence within a non-Ricardian alternative (due to finite horizon
s and/or distortionary taxation). I show that the estimates of the eff
ects of taxation on consumption are not robust and that standard tests
may have weaknesses which can lend to conflicting results, whether Ri
cardian equivalence holds or not, The simulations also show that no cl
ear conclusions about Ricardian equivalence can be drawn from observin
g a low correlation between the current account and government budget
deficits.