INTRAISCHEMIC BUT NOT POSTISCHEMIC BRAIN HYPOTHERMIA PROTECTS CHRONICALLY FOLLOWING GLOBAL FOREBRAIN ISCHEMIA IN RATS

Citation
Wd. Dietrich et al., INTRAISCHEMIC BUT NOT POSTISCHEMIC BRAIN HYPOTHERMIA PROTECTS CHRONICALLY FOLLOWING GLOBAL FOREBRAIN ISCHEMIA IN RATS, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism, 13(4), 1993, pp. 541-549
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,"Endocrynology & Metabolism",Hematology
ISSN journal
0271678X
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
541 - 549
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-678X(1993)13:4<541:IBNPBH>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
We investigated whether postischemic brain hypothermia (30-degrees-C) would permanently protect the hippocampus following global forebrain i schemia. Global ischemia was produced in anesthetized rats by bilatera l carotid artery occlusion plus hypotension (50 mm Hg). In the postisc hemic hypothermic group, brain temperature was maintained at 37-degree s-C during the 10-min ischemic insult but reduced to 30-degrees-C star ting 3 min into the recirculation period and maintained at 30-degrees- C for 3 h. In normothermic animals, intra- and postischemic brain temp erature was maintained at 37-degrees-C. After recovery for 3 days, 7 d ays, or 2 months, the extent of CA1 hippocampal histologic injury was quantitated. At 3 days after ischemia, postischemic hypothermia signif icantly protected the hippocampal CA1 sector compared with normothermi c animals. For example, within the medial, middle, and lateral CA1 sub sectors, the numbers of normal neurons were increased 20-, 13-, and 9- fold by postischemic hypothermia (p < 0.01). At 7 days after the ische mic insult, however, the degree of postischemic hypothermic protection was significantly reduced. In this case, the numbers of normal neuron s were increased an average of only threefold compared with normotherm ia. Ultrastructural analysis of 7-day postischemic hypothermic rats de monstrated CA1 pyramidal neurons showing variable degrees of injury su rrounded by reactive astrocytes and microglial cells. At 2 months afte r the ischemic insult, no trend for protection was demonstrated. In co ntrast to postischemic hypothermia, significant protection was seen at 2 months following intraischemic hypothermia. These data indicate tha t intraischemic, but not postischemic, brain hypothermia provides chro nic protection to the hippocampus after transient brain ischemia. The inability of postischemic hypothermia to protect chronically after 3 d ays could indicate that (a) postischemic hypothermia merely delays isc hemic cell death and/or (b) the postischemic brain undergoes a seconda ry insult. In postischemic treatment protocols, chronic survival studi es are required to determine accurately the ultimate histopathological outcome following global cerebral ischemia.