Cm. Doherty et al., TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND THE ASSESSMENT OF LUTEAL-PHASE ENDOMETRIUM, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 168(6), 1993, pp. 1702-1709
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine if ultrasonography
of the endometrium could be used to identify in a noninvasive manner p
atients with luteal phase defects. STUDY DESIGN: Patients underwent mi
dluteal transvaginal ultrasonography with photographing of the endomet
rial image, an endometrial biopsy, and two serum hormonal profiles. Th
e ultrasonographic images were graded and compared with the histologic
results and the serum hormonal profiles. RESULTS: There was a trend t
oward a higher grade image being associated with normal histologic stu
dies. There was no significant difference between the mean hormonal pr
ofiles in patients with normal and those with abnormal biopsy specimen
s. There was no significant difference between the hormonal values dra
wn before and those drawn after the biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Although th
e endometrial appearance on ultrasonography appears to reflect secreto
ry transformation, it cannot replace endometrial biopsy for full evalu
ation of luteal endometrial development. Short-term variability in ser
um concentrations of midluteal hormones was not demonstrated.