Hx. Zhou, BROWNIAN DYNAMICS STUDY OF THE INFLUENCES OF ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTION AND DIFFUSION ON PROTEIN-PROTEIN ASSOCIATION KINETICS, Biophysical journal, 64(6), 1993, pp. 1711-1726
A unified model is presented for protein-protein association processes
that are under the influences of electrostatic interaction and diffus
ion (e.g., protein oligomerization, enzyme catalysis, electron and ene
rgy transfer). The proteins are modeled as spheres that bear point cha
rges and undergo translational and rotational Brownian motion. Before
association can occur the two spheres have to be aligned properly to f
orm a reaction complex via diffusion. The reaction complex can either
go on to form the product or it can dissociate into the separate react
ants through diffusion. The electrostatic interaction, like diffusion,
influences every step except the one that brings the reaction complex
into the product. The interaction potential is obtained by extending
the Kirkwood-Tanford protein model (Tanford, C., and J. G. Kirkwood. 1
957. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79:5333-5339) to two charge-embedded spheres an
d solving the consequent equations under a particular basis set. The t
ime-dependent association rate coefficient is then obtained through Br
ownian dynamics simulations according an algorithm developed earlier (
Zhou, H.-X. 1990. J. Phys. Chem. 94:8794-8800). This method is applied
to a model system of the cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase ass
ociation process and the results confirm the experimental dependence o
f the association rate constant on the solution ionic strength. An imp
ortant conclusion drawn from this study is that when the product is fo
rmed by very specific alignment of the reactants, as is often the case
, the effect of the interaction potential is simply to scale the assoc
iation rate constant by a Boltzmann factor. This explains why mutation
s in the interface of the reaction complex have strong influences on t
he association rate constant whereas those away from the interface hav
e minimal effects. It comes about because the former mutations change
the interaction potential of the reaction complex significantly and th
e latter ones do not.