In the so-called in situ sequential interpenetrating polymer networks
(IPNs), the two networks are formed after each other, and the network
formed first is thought to impede gross phase separation in the final
material. This is contrary to the other type of IPNs (in situ simultan
eous), in which the formation of both networks is initiated at once an
d proceeds to completion more or less simultaneously. In order to veri
fy more accurately this assumption, which is not inconsistent with tra
nsmission electron microscopy findings, a solid-state nuclear magnetic
resonance lineshape analysis technique has been used to investigate t
he degree of phase dispersion of IPNs of both types composed of an ela
stomeric polyurethane (PUR) (25 wt%) and a crosslinked poly(methyl met
hacrylate). The results confirm that such IPNs, when prepared sequenti
ally, have a higher degree of phase dispersion than those obtained by
the simultaneous synthesis method. Furthermore, in the corresponding n
eat PUR networks, built up from aromatic pluriisocyanate and poly(oxyp
ropylene glycol) (POPG), the rigid crosslink points are not composed o
f isocyanate only, but include some oxypropylene mers; it appears that
the amount of the rigidified part is the same, whatever the molecular
weight of POPG.