Three models for word frequency distributions, the lognormal law, the
generalized inverse Gauss-Poisson law and the extended generalized Zip
f's law are compared and evaluated with respect to goodness of fit and
rationale. Application of these models to frequency distributions of
a text, a corpus and morphological data reveals that no model can lay
claim to exclusive validity, while inspection of the extrapolated theo
retical vocabulary sizes raises doubts as to whether the urn scheme wi
th independent trials is the correct underlying model for word frequen
cy data. The role of morphology in shaping word frequency distribution
s is discussed, as well as parallelisms between vocabulary richness in
literary studies and morphological productivity in linguistics.