A series of simulations is reported in which extant formal categorizat
ion models are applied to human rule-learning data (Salatas & Bourne,
1974). These data show that there are clear differences in the ease wi
th which humans learn rules, with the conjunctive the easiest and the
biconditional the hardest. The original ALCOVE model (an exemplar-base
d model), a configural-cue model, and two-layer backpropagation models
did not fit the rule-learning data. ALCOVE successfully fit the data,
however, when prior biases observed in human rule learning were imple
mented into weights of the network. Thus, current empirical learning m
odels may not fare well in situations in which learners enter the conc
ept-formation situation with preconceived biases regarding the kinds o
f concepts that are possible, but such biases might nevertheless be ca
ptured within these models. By incorporating preexperimental biases, A
LCOVE may hold promise as a comprehensive category-learning model.