C. Dye et al., SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF LEISHMANIASIS - ON DETECTING INFECTION AS WELL AS DISEASE, Epidemiology and infection, 110(3), 1993, pp. 647-656
Serological tests are very frequently used in epidemiological surveys
of leishmaniasis and other parasitoses. Their sensitivity and specific
ity are generally defined with respect to parasitism and disease, rath
er than infection. The reason is that known positives are those indivi
duals most likely to yield parasites, or who have distinctive clinical
signs, and concomitantly high antibody titres. This paper investigate
s the performance of one serological method, the indirect fluorescent
antibody test (IFAT), in detecting Leishmania infantum infection durin
g an intensive 2-year cohort study of dogs in southern France. The res
ults show that sensitivity and specificity with respect to infection c
an be simultaneously high, but maximum sensitivity is probably < 80 %,
and lasts for a relatively short period of 2-3 months after a lengthy
incubation period. The IFAT gave the incidence of infection as 18-65
% in the first year, whereas the best estimate of incidence based on p
arasite isolation and clinical observation was 72 %. But data from the
second year suggest that the 72 % was itself an underestimate. We arg
ue that, during epidemiological surveys, the IFAT in particular, and s
erological tests for leishmania in general, will underestimate prevale
nce, incidence and hence the scale of the control problem. However, th
ere is evidence that tests for canine leishmaniasis employing high thr
eshold titres will identify the most infectious animals, allowing sele
ctive treatment or culling of those which contribute disproportionatel
y to transmission.