Objective: Heat stress, with the expression of heat stress proteins, h
as been shown to protect the rabbit heart in vitro against global isch
aemia/reperfusion injury, though no benefit is apparent in an in vivo
rabbit model of infarct size. The aim of this study was therefore to i
nvestigate this discrepancy and to discover whether heating itself has
any effect which could negate the protection derived from myocardial
stress protein synthesis. Methods: (1) To ascertain whether heat stres
s could limit infarct size in the absence of blood, isolated buffer pe
rfused hearts, with or without prior heat stress, were subjected to 45
min of regional ischaemia and 120 min reperfusion, and the resulting
infarct size was expressed as a percentage of the risk area (I/R%). (2
) The observations were repeated in an isolated blood perfused heart m
odel in which a support rabbit (heat stressed or control) was used to
perfuse the isolated heart. Results: In the buffer perfused heart, pri
or heat stress reduced I/R from 70.8(SEM 4.4)%. n=10, in controls to 5
1.5(5.7)%, n=12 (p<0.05). In hearts perfused by support rabbits, prior
heat stress reduced I/R [from 34.7(3.7)%, n=16, to 23.5(3.3)%, n=15 (
p<0.05)] only when the perfusing rabbit was a control (not heat stress
ed). If the perfusing rabbit had been heated, I/R was greater in both
heat stressed and control hearts [5 1.9(7.0)% and 44.9(3.3)%, p<0.05 v
control support rabbit]. Conclusions: Heat stress limits infarct size
in this rabbit model. However it appears to have additional adverse e
ffects, probably on the blood, which may override any benefit associat
ed with myocardial stress protein synthesis.