La. Isbell et Tp. Young, SOCIAL AND ECOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON ACTIVITY BUDGETS OF VERVET MONKEYS, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP LIVING, Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 32(6), 1993, pp. 377-385
Activity patterns were documented over a 20-month period in six groups
of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) in Amboseli National Park,
Kenya. Group size varied both among groups and within groups through
time. The home ranges of two groups were located in Acacia xanthophloe
a habitat whereas those of four adjacent groups were located in A. tor
tilis habitat. Repeated measures analysis of variance, three-way analy
sis of variance, and meta-analysis of group size effects were carried
out on feeding, moving, resting, scanning, allo-grooming, and 'other'
behavior. Time spent feeding varied seasonally, peaking during periods
when A. tortilis seeds were eaten. However, time spent feeding did no
t vary within or among groups, or between habitats, males and females,
or dominants and subordinates. Males spend more time scanning and les
s time allo-grooming than females, and high-ranking individuals of bot
h sexes spent more time scanning than low-ranking individuals. Among f
emales, subordinates spent more time moving, whereas among males, domi
nants spent more time moving. Groups living in A. xanthophloea habitat
spent more time moving and allo-grooming than groups in A. tortilis h
abitat but this may have been confounded by the fact that these two gr
oups were on average larger than the others. Significant differences i
n activity budgets among groups demonstrate that activity patterns obs
erved in one group are not always readily generalized to other groups
even when they come from the same population. Group size analyses exam
ined potential costs and benefits of group living. Increased intragrou
p competition, measured by time spent moving and feeding, was only wea
kly evident in larger groups. Individuals in larger groups allo-groome
d more than individuals in smaller groups. Self-grooming also increase
d in larger groups. Individuals in larger groups spent less time scann
ing than individuals in smaller groups, but there was more scanning pe
r group in larger groups than in smaller groups.