This paper suggests that conventional constant-elasticity regression s
pecifications provide a better format for testing Wagner's ''law'' of
expanding public sector than a Box-Cox alternative. Four major conside
rations are brought out. First, year-to-year variability of elasticity
is not relevant to Wagner's hypothesis; what is needed is the ''avera
ge'' elasticity for the entire period, and an estimate of that is dire
ctly given by the conventional models but not by the Box-Cox formulati
ons. Second, calculation of an average from the Box-Cox estimates invo
lves an ad hoc procedure, and no statistic is available for formal hyp
othesis tests. Third, the non-linear Box-Cox models are more complex a
nd computationally more expensive. Most important, a comparison of the
Box-Cox estimates with those obtained from conventional models indica
tes that the Box-Cox results are less satisfactory in many cases.