J. Woodcockmitchell et al., MYOSIN ISOFORM EXPRESSION IN DEVELOPING AND REMODELING RAT LUNG, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 8(6), 1993, pp. 617-625
The tissue distribution of myosin isoforms was examined in developing
smooth muscle of rat lung. Antisera employed included a general smooth
muscle myosin antibody (aSMMG) and two smooth muscle myosin isoform s
pecific antisera (aSM1 and aSM2). In the pseudoglandular, canalicular,
and saccular lung, the isoform-specific aSM1 antiserum was very light
ly reactive only with large airway and not reactive with vascular smoo
th muscle, whereas aSM2 was unreactive with any lung cells. During the
se same stages, the aSMMG serum reacted well with the mesenchymal coat
around the larger airways, declining in intensity as the tube size di
minished. Vascular smooth muscle elements had only moderate reactivity
at this time. In the adult, aSM1 marked airway smooth muscle as well
as the tips of the alveolar septae. Vascular reactivity was seen in bo
th arterial and venous elements. An identical distribution of reactivi
ty was seen for aSMMG. aSM2 reactivity appeared confined primarily to
airway smooth muscle and was absent from all but the largest vascular
structures. Companion Western blot analyses confirmed the presence of
SM1 in fetal and mature tissues as well as the relative lack of SM2 in
all but the fully differentiated airways. Lung injury due to intratra
cheal instillation of bleomycin is characterized by a proliferation of
mesenchymal cells similar to immature smooth muscle cells. These cell
s express smooth muscle forms of actin but lacked the mature smooth mu
scle myosin isoforms. In summary, differentiation of smooth muscle in
the lung proceeds with progressive replacement of nonmuscle isoforms o
f myosin with differentiation-specific forms. In this regard, the matu
ration of vascular muscle tissue lags behind that of nonvascular (visc
eral) muscle structures. Further, the staining of some structures with
aSMMG, but not aSM1 or aSM2, early in development suggests either a d
istinct organizational pattern or the presence of as yet uncharacteriz
ed smooth muscle-specific myosin isoforms.