S. Samuelsson et J. Ronnberg, IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT USE OF SCRIPTED CONSTRAINTS IN LIPREADING, European journal of cognitive psychology, 5(2), 1993, pp. 201-233
The interaction between typicality, abstraction and temporal order wit
hin scripts, and different contextual conditions, was specified in a l
ip-reading model of predictive sentence comprehension. The model sugge
sts both an implicit and an explicit mode of script processing, emphas
ising either hierarchical or temporal representations within scripts.
In each of five experiments, subjects lip-read 48 sentences from three
scripts. Different levels of abstraction (basic vs low-level), typica
lity (typical vs atypical) and temporal order (early vs late) were alw
ays embedded in each sentence. To assess a baseline, Experiment 1 meas
ured ''pure'' lip-reading in the absence of scripted context. In Exper
iment 2, the script header was present. Experiment 3 correctly or fals
ely primed the script activation along each organisational dimension.
In Experiment 4, the subjects received correct or false script-scene i
nformation, either before or after sentence presentation. In Experimen
t 5, the subjects received either basic or specific scene context befo
re sentence presentation. The results confirmed the predictions in tha
t: (a) there were minor dimensional effects when the script heading wa
s absent; (b) typicality and abstraction constituted the main organise
rs within scripts, and typical, basic-level information occurring late
was always implicitly activated; (c) the temporal structure at atypic
al, low levels of abstraction was the only dimension that was explicit
ly activated (i.e. sensitive to false cueing); (d) pre-exposed correct
script-scene context enhanced lipreading relative to the other condit
ions; and (e) specific scene context optimises a vertical ''upwards''
activation for basic and typical representations. It was concluded tha
t the predictive script model of lip-reading received strong support,
and that a ''weak'' hierarchical view of scripts is compatible with im
plicit processing, whereas a ''strong'' temporal view is compatible wi
th explicit script processing.