Over the past decade it has become increasingly difficult to site noxi
ous facilities, despite the fact that there is a growing need to do so
. To address this problem, a set of guidelines for a fairer, wiser, an
d more workable siting process - the Facility Siting Credo - was devel
oped during a National Facility Siting Workshop in 1990. This paper pr
esents an empirical test of these guidelines. A questionnaire based on
the Credo was completed by stakeholders in 29 waste facility siting c
ases, both successful and unsuccessful, across the United States and C
anada. Using an independent determination of outcome (success), a prel
iminary ranking of the importance of various Credo principles was obta
ined. The data reveal that establishing trust between the developer an
d host community is an important factor in facilitating the siting pro
cess. The siting process is most likely to be successful when the comm
unity perceives the facility design to be appropriate and to satisfy i
ts needs. Public participation also is seen to be an important process
variable, particularly if it encourages a view that the facility best
meets community needs. Moreover, a siting process where communities v
olunteer to host facilities is an approach that holds promise for meet
ing many of these key success criteria.