D. Shibata et al., GENETIC-HETEROGENEITY OF THE C-K-RAS LOCUS IN COLORECTAL ADENOMAS BUTNOT IN ADENOCARCINOMAS, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(13), 1993, pp. 1058-1063
Background: Previous molecular genetics studies of colorectal cancer h
ave identified multiple mutations in the c-K-ras gene (also known as K
RAS2) in all phases of its development. Because of technical difficult
y, prior studies rarely focused attention on the detailed distribution
of c-K-ras mutations in multiple regions of the same primary tumor sp
ecimen. However, with recent development of the selective UV radiation
fractionation method, characterization of c-K-ras mutations in multip
le regions of the same primary tumor specimen can be performed. Purpos
e: Our purpose was to describe how c-K-ras mutations were distributed
among cells obtained from multiple regions of the same primary tumor i
n an attempt to describe differences between early and late colorectal
carcinogenesis. Methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blo
cks were obtained. Seven adenocarcinomas and seven adenomas were selec
ted for the presence of mutant c-K-ras genes and histologic transition
s between normal and neoplastic tissue. Tissue sections were prepared
for analysis by the selective UV radiation fractionation method by pla
cing thin, fixed tissue sections on a plastic slide with no coverslip.
Under the microscope, small ink dots from a felt-tip pen were manuall
y placed directly on relatively pure cell subpopulations. The slides w
ere placed with the tissue side exposed to a UV transillumintor for 2-
4 hours to inactivate the DNA present in the unprotected (''undotted''
) cells. Individual dots were cut out of the plastic slide into 2 x 2-
mm squares and placed into microfuge tubes. The DNA was extracted and
supernatant used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Mutatio
ns at c-K-ras codons 12 and 13 were detected. Results: The selective U
V radiation fractionation method and PCR analysis revealed that c-K-ra
s mutations never extended into normal mucosa and were present in all
neoplastic cells regardless of phenotypes in all seven adenocarcinomas
and three of the seven adenomas. Further examination of two carcinoma
s for p53 (also known as TP53) mutations or loss of heterozygosity dem
onstrated that these additional mutations were also present in all tum
or cells, suggesting that a single transformed clone was responsible f
or the majority of growth. However, in four other adenomas, tumor hete
rogeneity was demonstrated, since c-K-ras mutations were detected only
in discrete portions. Conclusions: Adenoma formation may include a st
age in which multiple and genetically distinct neoplastic clones are p
resent, while most carcinomas appear to have a homogeneous composition
that may result from the successful progression of one of these clone
s.