Dg. Hoel et al., INFLUENCE OF DEATH CERTIFICATE ERRORS ON CANCER MORTALITY TRENDS, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(13), 1993, pp. 1063-1068
Background: Evaluation of mortality data is an important tool in asses
sing both disease time trends and differences in populations. However,
the reasons for changes in cancer mortality rates have been controver
sial. Questions have been raised concerning whether these increases ar
e real or simply the result of changing diagnoses and death certificat
e reporting. Purpose: Our purpose was to determine on the basis of aut
opsy data if death certificate reporting varies over age, time, and ca
ncer type and to explore the effect of death certificate error on rece
nt cancer mortality trends. Methods: Data were analyzed from 5886 auto
psies collected by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation in Hirosh
ima, Japan, between 1961 and 1987. Death certificates were linked to a
utopsy data for analyses. An adjustment factor was calculated as a rat
io of the accuracy of these death certificates in identifying cancer (
detection rate) and listing cancer (confirmation rate) as the cause of
death. This adjustment factor measures bias in mortality rates due to
death certification errors and quantifies underestimation and overest
imation of cancer mortality rates. Results: Our analyses focused on ly
mphoma, breast cancer, neoplasms of the brain, multiple myeloma, and m
elanoma because of reported mortality increases. For these cancers, th
e adjustment factor decreased significantly (P = .02) over time, imply
ing that death certificate accuracy has improved. This change appears
to account for 60% of the observed increase in these cancers during th
e time period of study. For total cancer, persons 75 years or older ha
ve a high adjustment factor but it decreased over time. This decrease
suggests an artifactual increase in total cancer mortality rates of ab
out 1% per year for this older group. Conclusions: The quality of deat
h certificate reporting has generally remained constant for most group
s during the period 1961-1987. In the study population, there was a co
nsistent underestimation of total cancer mortality of about 18%. For t
he five types of cancer studied, there has been less underestimation o
f cancer mortality since 1976. For some specific cancers and for perso
ns 75 years or older, improvements in death certificate accuracy have
occurred over time. These data imply that the total death certificate
error rate varies considerably by cancer type, time period, and age at
death. Implications: The changes in death certificate reporting for s
ome sites and the elderly appear to have artifactually created increas
es in cancer mortality rates. These artifacts need to be considered wh
en using mortality data for prevention research and health care planni
ng.