A provisional restorative material must be strong enough to resist fra
cture during function. This study tested five autopolymerizing provisi
onal resin materials under conditions that related the stresses acting
on them to those acting on a fixed partial denture. The highest value
s for fracture resistance were displayed by Snap poly(ethyl methacryla
te) material. However, two of the 11 samples of this material displaye
d markedly lower values for fracture resistance. This finding warrants
further investigation, because inconsistency has clinical implication
s. In decreasing order, the fracture resistance of the other materials
was as follows: the poly(methyl methacrylate) materials, Caulk tempor
ary bridge resin and G-C Unifast temporary resin; the composite materi
al, Protemp; and the epimine material, Scutan.