Ph. Michel et J. Bloem, CONVERSION FACTORS FOR ESTIMATION OF CELL PRODUCTION-RATES OF SOIL BACTERIA FROM [H-3] THYMIDINE AND [H-3] LEUCINE INCORPORATION, Soil biology & biochemistry, 25(7), 1993, pp. 943-950
Thymidine and leucine incorporation into NaOH-extractable macromolecul
es were examined as methods for estimating bacterial production rates
in soil. Six out of ten bacterial strains isolated from soil incorpora
ted thymidine and all incorporated leucine. Three of the strains which
incorporated [H-3]thymidine were grown as a mixture in four continuou
s cultures with generation times of 1.12-4.12 days. Empirical conversi
on factors were determined by simultaneous measurement of thymidine an
d leucine incorporation and bacterial cell and carbon production. Isot
ope dilution was determined at each generation time to enhance the acc
uracy of incorporation measurements. Empirical conversion factors for
thymidine ranged from 0.2 to 1.1 x 10(18) cells mol-1 with a mean of 0
.54 x 10(18) cells mol-1. Empirical conversion factors for leucine (0.
38-1.8 x 10(16) cells mol-1) were low when compared to previously dete
rmined conversion factors. Significant differences among empirical con
version factors measured for leucine at the four generation times were
found, suggesting a dependence of the empirical conversion factor for
leucine on generation time. Addition of gamma-sterilized soil before
incorporation measurements did not effect thymidine incorporation. Leu
cine incorporation, however, was significantly increased by an enhance
d extraction of leucine-labelled macromolecules. We conclude that conv
ersion factors for calculation of in situ cell production of soil bact
eria from [H-3]thymidine incorporation are in the same range as conver
sion factors published for aquatic bacteria. Thymidine incorporation o
ffers a direct quantitative estimate of bacterial cell production in s
oil. A drawback of the thymidine method is that not all soil bacteria
are able to incorporate thymidine, which may lead to conservative prod
uction estimates. The leucine method needs further investigation befor
e it is applicable to natural soil samples.