A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES IN THE LABORATORY

Citation
S. Tamari et al., A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES IN THE LABORATORY, Soil Science Society of America journal, 57(3), 1993, pp. 642-651
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
ISSN journal
03615995
Volume
57
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
642 - 651
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-5995(1993)57:3<642:ASMFDS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Both soil water retention curve and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data are often necessary for solving soil unsaturated flow problems. This study investigated two versions of a simple laboratory method for determining soil hydraulic properties of homogeneous and rigid soil s amples. Three evaporation experiments (soil columns of 106-mm diam. an d 60-mm height) were made with a silt loam soil packed at different bu lk densities (0.96, 1.31, and 1.54 Mg m-3). Bulk density and water con tent profiles were determined by gamma attenuation (Cs-137 and Am-241) , while pressure head profiles were recorded using microtensiometers, and average column water contents were computed using sample weight me asurements. Evaporation experiments were also simulated by solving Ric hards' equation with a Galerkin finite-clement method. Three methods f or the estimation of the hydraulic properties were used: the reference method, which requires the pressure head and water content profiles a t several times, and the original and modified Wind methods, which req uire the average column water content at several times instead of the water content profile. Experimental results showed that the hydraulic properties obtained with the modified Wind method agreed well with tho se obtained with the reference method. Simulated data were used to com pare the original and modified Wind methods, and to determine the effe ct of added noise on the determination of soil hydraulic properties. U sing the numerical experiments, it was shown that the modified Wind me thod provided results slightly better than those of the original Wind method when the number of tensiometers was greater than three. When me asurement errors were taken into account, estimation of the water rete ntion curves using the modified Wind method was not very sensitive to experimental errors, but small uncertainties in tensiometric data infl uenced greatly the hydraulic conductivities determined in wet conditio ns.