S. Tamari et al., A SIMPLE METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES IN THE LABORATORY, Soil Science Society of America journal, 57(3), 1993, pp. 642-651
Both soil water retention curve and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity
data are often necessary for solving soil unsaturated flow problems.
This study investigated two versions of a simple laboratory method for
determining soil hydraulic properties of homogeneous and rigid soil s
amples. Three evaporation experiments (soil columns of 106-mm diam. an
d 60-mm height) were made with a silt loam soil packed at different bu
lk densities (0.96, 1.31, and 1.54 Mg m-3). Bulk density and water con
tent profiles were determined by gamma attenuation (Cs-137 and Am-241)
, while pressure head profiles were recorded using microtensiometers,
and average column water contents were computed using sample weight me
asurements. Evaporation experiments were also simulated by solving Ric
hards' equation with a Galerkin finite-clement method. Three methods f
or the estimation of the hydraulic properties were used: the reference
method, which requires the pressure head and water content profiles a
t several times, and the original and modified Wind methods, which req
uire the average column water content at several times instead of the
water content profile. Experimental results showed that the hydraulic
properties obtained with the modified Wind method agreed well with tho
se obtained with the reference method. Simulated data were used to com
pare the original and modified Wind methods, and to determine the effe
ct of added noise on the determination of soil hydraulic properties. U
sing the numerical experiments, it was shown that the modified Wind me
thod provided results slightly better than those of the original Wind
method when the number of tensiometers was greater than three. When me
asurement errors were taken into account, estimation of the water rete
ntion curves using the modified Wind method was not very sensitive to
experimental errors, but small uncertainties in tensiometric data infl
uenced greatly the hydraulic conductivities determined in wet conditio
ns.