We investigate the changes to a fully developed turbulent boundary lay
er caused by the presence of a two-dimensional moving wave of waveleng
th L = 2-pi/k and amplitude a. Attention is focused on small slopes, a
k, and small wave speeds, c, so that the linear perturbations are calc
ulated as asymptotic sequences in the limit (u + c)/U(B)(L) --> 0 (u*
is the unperturbed friction velocity and U(B)(L) is the approach-flow
mean velocity at height L). The perturbations can then be described b
y an extension of the four-layer asymptotic structure developed by Hun
t, Leibovich & Richards (1988) to calculate the changes to a boundary
layer passing over a low hill. When (U + C)/U(B)(L) is small, the mat
ched height, z(m) (the height where U(B) equals c), lies within an inn
er surface layer, where the perturbation Reynolds shear stress varies
only slowly. Solutions across the matched height are then constructed
by considering an equation for the shear stress. The importance of the
shear-stress perturbation at the matched height implies that the invi
scid theory of Miles (1957) is inappropriate in this parameter range.
The perturbations above the inner surface layer are not directly influ
enced by the matched height and the region of reversed flow below z(m)
: they are similar to the perturbations due to a static undulation, bu
t the 'effective roughness length' that determines the shape of the un
perturbed velocity profile is modified to z(m) = z0 exp(kappac/u). Th
e solutions for the perturbations to the boundary layer are used to ca
lculate the growth rate of waves, which is determined at leading order
by the asymmetric pressure perturbation induced by the thickening of
the perturbed boundary layer on the leeside of the wave crest. At firs
t order in (u + c)/U(B)(L), however, there are three new effects whic
h, numerically, contribute significantly to the growth rate, namely: t
he asymmetries in both the normal and shear Reynolds stresses associat
ed with the leeside thickening of the boundary layer, and asymmetric p
erturbations induced by the varying surface velocity associated with t
he fluid motion in the wave; further asymmetries induced by the variat
ion in the surface roughness along the wave may also be important.