The practice of matching younger, language-matched controls, in additi
on to age-matched controls, is often used in studies of language-disor
dered children to examine the role of ''language level'' on performanc
e. However, the interpretation of the relative performance of subjects
in studies using such dual control groups is problematic. Conceptual
concerns arise with the use of language matches because language is a
multidimensional skill that is not reflected equivalently for the lang
uage-disordered children and their language-matched controls. Furtherm
ore, matching by language level inevitably introduces an extraneous ag
e effect that confounds interpretation. In addition, erroneous interpr
etations of null findings can occur when no differences are found betw
een language-disordered and language-matched groups.