Ad. Pereira et al., VARIABILITY OF SELF-REPORTED MEASURES OF ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DRINKING IN PREGNANCY AND BIRTH-WEIGHT, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 47(4), 1993, pp. 326-330
Study objective-To describe the intrasubject variability of self repor
ted maternal alcohol consumption using different ways of collecting in
formation and to analyse the implications of this variability for rese
arch into the effect of low to moderate maternal alcohol consumption o
n birth weight. Design-This was a longitudinal study. Self reported ma
ternal alcohol consumption before, during, and after pregnancy was ass
essed on four occasions over two years. The data were collected by two
self administered questionnaires and during two personal interviews (
one by phone and another face to face). Settings-The Obstetrics Depart
ment, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Funen, Denmark. Participants
-A total of 2880 pregnant women were recruited consecutively from the
hospital catchment area. Altogether 328 pregnant women and their babie
s were selected. All women who reported an average alcohol consumption
of five drinks or more per week were recruited to the study (164 wome
n) and a 1:1 control group was selected from the remaining women based
upon two matching criteria: expected date of delivery and the women's
year of birth. Some 279 women (85%) completed the study. Measurements
and main results-self reported alcohol consumption (number of drinks
per week) and birth weight (g) were the main outcomes. Women's self re
ported alcohol consumption varied over time and according to the data
collection method. When different methods of data collection were used
to assess alcohol intake in similar periods of time, significant diff
erences in reporting were found despite the relatively high correlatio
ns between the measurements. Although a consistent reduction in birth
weight with increasing consumption of alcohol was found, there were di
fferences in the shape and strength of this association when comparing
the six available alcohol measurements. Conclusions-The type of quest
ions used, the way the data were collected, the period of time referre
d to, and the time the questions were asked, should be taken into cons
ideration when describing the drinking pattern of pregnant women. Furt
hermore, birth weight results from studies that have used different al
cohol measures should be interpreted or compared with caution because
of possible large differences resulting from the differing methods of
assessing fetal exposure to alcohol.