P. Senn et al., INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL AND KETAMINE FOR RETROBULBAR BLOCK IN OPHTHALMIC SURGERY, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, 202(6), 1993, pp. 528-532
Background: Eye surgery is performed under local anesthesia in more th
an 90% of the cases. While injecting the local anesthetics a deep seda
tion is desired. During surgery however the patient should be cooperat
ive, such as to avoid inadvertent movements. We routinely perform loca
l anesthesia (retrobulbar injection and van Lint block) under intraven
ous anesthesia with propofol (Disoprivan(R)) and ketamine (Ketalar(R),
Ketanest(R)). Patients and methods: To control safety and efficacy of
this method a prospective study was performed including 100 consecuti
ve patients. The results were to be compared with an earlier study whe
re 35 Patients received midazolam (Dormicum(R)) and alfentanil (Rapife
n(R)) as sedation. The actual protocol included the following points:
1. Personel judgement of the patient, 2. Conditions to perform the ret
robulbar injection, 3. Intraoperative conditions and additional sedati
on, 4. Pulse, blood pressure and blood oxygen concentration, 5. Compli
cations Results: >95% of the patients had a total amnesia of the injec
tion of local anesthetics. Retrobulbar injection is comfortable (96%),
but may be difficult in patients with a narrow orbit and exotropia (4
%). Intraoperative conditions were noted as good in 97%. Additional se
dation during surgery was necessary in 3%. Blood pressure and pulse re
mained stable. Blood oxygen concentration showed a tendency to sink du
ring intravenous anesthesia. This could be managed easily by additiona
l oxygen via face mask if necessary. Postoperative emesis was noted in
3%. No further ocular complications occured that might be related to
the anesthetic management. In an earlier study including 35 Patients u
nder comparable conditions we used midazolam and alfentanil for sedati
on. The results were similar. Midazolam and alfentanil were then used
in over 2000 operations. Often the patients were deeply sedated and as
leep during surgery which meant a potential risk of a sudden awakening
and moving the head inadvertently. Occasionally paradoxical reactions
occurred after midazolam. Conclusions: Using propofol and ketamine wh
ile performing the local anesthesia the patients are awake but relaxed
and cooperative during surgery. This method has now been used routine
ly in over 1000 cases. It has proved to be clinically safe and efficia
nt. It offers the surgeon good working conditions and is well tolerate
d by the patients, reducing their preoperative and perioperative anxie
ties.