Sj. Mcintosh et al., CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF VASODEPRESSOR, CARDIOINHIBITORY, AND MIXED CAROTID-SINUS SYNDROME IN THE ELDERLY, The American journal of medicine, 95(2), 1993, pp. 203-208
PURPOSE: Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) is frequently overlooked as a ca
use of syncope in the elderly. It is diagnosed when carotid sinus mass
age (CSM) produces asystole exceeding 3 seconds (cardioinhibitory CSS)
, a reduction in systolic blood pressure exceeding 50 mm Hg independen
t of heart rate slowing (vasodepressor CSS), or a combination of the t
wo (mixed CSS). Most published data pertain to the cardioinhibitory su
btype. The recent availability of noninvasive phasic blood pressure mo
nitoring has allowed accurate routine assessment of the vasodepressor
response to CSM. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical char
acteristics of vasodepressor, cardioinhibitory, and mixed CSS. PATIENT
S AND METHODs. CSM was carried out on 132 consecutive patients over 65
years referred for investigation of dizziness, falls, or syncope. Mas
sage was performed both supine and upright with continuous electrocard
iographic and phasic blood pressure monitoring. Patients exhibiting gr
eater than 1.5-second asystole were given 600 mug of intravenous atrop
ine to abolish heart rate slowing and allow assessment of the pure vas
odepressor response. RESULTs. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity was docum
ented in 64 patients (mean age 81 +/- 7 years, 31 male). The response
was vasodepressor in 37%, cardioinhibitory in 29%, and mixed in 34%. T
hirty-six patients had recurrent syncope, 17 presented with unexplaine
d falls, and the remainder had dizziness alone. Symptoms had been pres
ent for a median of 24 months, and the median number of syncopal episo
des was four. Twenty-five percent had sustained a fracture and, of the
se, 93% had not experienced a prodrome. Head movement precipitated sym
ptoms in 47% and vagal stimuli in 73%. Episodes were unwitnessed in tw
o thirds of patients. Twelve patients who presented with falls denied
syncope but had witnessed loss of consciousness during CSM. Mean cardi
oinhibition was 5 +/- 2 seconds and mean vasodepression 61 +/- 9 mm Hg
. The blood pressure nadir occurred rapidly at 18 +/- 3 seconds after
massage, and baseline values were regained at 30 +/- 6 seconds. The cl
inical characteristics of patients with vasodepressor, cardioinhibitor
y, and mixed responses were similar. CONCLUSION: CSS is an underdiagno
sed cause of dizziness, falls, and syncope in the elderly. The vasodep
ressor form occurs more frequently than previously reported and has cl
inical characteristics similar to those of the cardioinhibitory and mi
xed subtypes. Elderly patients with this condition may deny syncope an
d present with recurrent unexplained falls. CSM, ideally with noninvas
ive phasic blood pressure monitoring, should be routinely performed in
elderly patients with unexplained bradycardic or hypotensive symptoms
.