L. Bobo et Jr. Kluegel, OPPOSITION TO RACE-TARGETING - SELF-INTEREST, STRATIFICATION IDEOLOGY, OR RACIAL-ATTITUDES, American sociological review, 58(4), 1993, pp. 443-464
Although traditional anti-black prejudice among whites has decreased s
ince the 1940s, social policies designed to assist blacks continue to
face opposition and controversy. Accounts have pointed to self-interes
t, American beliefs about inequality, or persistent negative racial at
titudes as underlying causes of widespread opposition to race-targeted
policies. We hypothesize that opposition hinges on the explicitness o
f the race-targeting and whether the policy's goal is opportunity enha
ncement or equality of outcomes. We also hypothesize that the influenc
e of individuals' self-interest, beliefs about inequality, and racial
attitudes on opinions differs by whether or not a policy is race-targe
ted and by a policy's goal. We use data from the 1990 General Social S
urvey to analyze opinion toward race-targeted versus income-targeted o
pportunity-enhancing policies and toward race-targeted versus income-t
argeted equal outcomes policies. Results of these analyses lend genera
l support to our hypotheses, and in particular, underscore the influen
ce of group self-interest and perceived discrimination on white opposi
tion to race-targeted policy.