SEDATION AND PATIENT MONITORING IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY

Citation
Vgm. Mcdermott et al., SEDATION AND PATIENT MONITORING IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, British journal of radiology, 66(788), 1993, pp. 667-671
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
British journal of radiology
ISSN journal
00071285 → ACNP
Volume
66
Issue
788
Year of publication
1993
Pages
667 - 671
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
A postal survey of British and Irish interventional radiologists was c arried out in 1991 in order to assess current practice with respect to sedation and monitoring of patients during angiography and interventi onal procedures. The response rate was 65%. 49% of patients are fasted prior to angiography and 68% prior to interventional procedures. Radi ologists participate in obtaining consent in 60% of cases. Patients ar e often (50%) sedated for angiography and usually (62 94% depending on the procedure) sedated for interventional procedures. Nurses are pres ent for most procedures, but are given the task of monitoring the pati ent's vital signs in only 49% of cases. Anaesthetists are present for less than 10% of interventional procedures. Pulse oximetry is used rou tinely in 20% of departments, and automatic blood pressure monitors in 16%. 28% of radiologists never administer oxygen to patients under se dation, whereas 4% always do. 43% of departments have a staffed recove ry area. Most vascular/interventional suites are stocked with emergenc y drugs and 80% with a defibrillator. 28% of departments report at lea st one death during or shortly after a procedure during the last 10 ye ars. 18% of interventional radiologists have taken a refresher course in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the past year. These findings indi cate a wide variation in practice and a need to standardize practice a t a uniform high level.