Wc. Lee et Ao. Fuller, HERPES-SIMPLEX VIRUS TYPE-1 AND PSEUDORABIES VIRUS BIND TO A COMMON SATURABLE RECEPTOR ON VERO CELLS THAT IS NOT HEPARAN-SULFATE, Journal of virology, 67(9), 1993, pp. 5088-5097
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and pseudorabies virus (PRV) infec
t different natural hosts but are very similar in structure, replicati
ve cycle, and entry into cultured cells. We determined whether HSV-1 a
nd PRV use the same cellular components during entry into Vero cells,
which are highly susceptible to each virus but are not from native hos
ts for either. UV-inactivated virions of either HSV-1 or PRV could sat
urate cell surfaces to block infection of challenge HSV-1 or PRV. In t
he presence of saturating levels for infection of either virus, radiol
abeled virus bound well and in a heparin-sensitive manner. This result
shows that heparan sulfate proteoglycans on Vero cells are not the li
miting cellular component. To identify the virus component required fo
r blocking, we used an HSV-1 null mutant virus lacking gB, gD, or gH a
s blocking virus. Virions lacking gB were able to block infection of c
hallenge virus to the same level as did virus containing gB. In contra
st, virions lacking gD lost all and most of the ability to block infec
tion of HSV-1 and PRV, respectively. HSV-1 lacking gH and PRV lacking
gp50 also were less competent in blocking infection of challenge virus
. We conclude that HSV-1 and PRV bind to a common receptor for infecti
on of Vero cells. Although both viruses bind a heparin-like cell compo
nent on many cells, including Vero cells, they also attach to a differ
ent and limited cell surface component that is bound at least by HSV-1
gD and possibly gH and to some degree by PRV gp50 but not gB. These r
esults clearly demonstrate binding of both HSV-1 and PRV to a common c
ell receptor that is not heparan sulfate and demonstrate that several
types of attachment occur for both viruses during infectious entry.