Forest assets are commonly viewed as good hedges against inflation. Th
e view is based largely, however, on anecdotal evidence rather than em
pirical analysis. This paper examines the historical relationship betw
een forestry returns and inflation. The results suggest that forests i
n the U.S. West and South have been superior hedges against higher-tha
n-anticipated inflation; forests in the Northeast have been less effec
tive inflation hedges. The results also indicate that western and sout
hern forests have been overvalued during periods of relatively high ex
pected inflation. Markets for forests in the Northeast, however, have
been relatively efficient processors of inflation expectations.