Popular theory wants to explain much of the fertility decline of the 1
960s and the 1970s as a consequence of the growth in paid employment a
mong women during the same period. The negative relationship generally
found between family size and women's labour-force participation on t
he individual level is often given a similar interpretation. Our findi
ngs in this paper suggest that such notions are too simple. In an anal
ysis of data from the Swedish fertility survey of 1981, there is a red
uction in labour-force participation connected with childbearing, but
we are unable to discern any appreciable converse influence of the ind
ividual employment history on childbearing patterns, represented here
by the progression to the third birth. We also find the opposite of wh
at economic theory has predicted concerning the impact of education on
childbearing: more highly educated Swedish mothers of two children pr
ogress to a third birth more readily than corresponding women with les
s education. The one-sided influence from childbearing to reduced empl
oyment should be sufficient to explain the negative relationship menti
oned, and it seems that an understanding of the causes of the fertilit
y decline must be found elsewhere than in a theory of labour-specific
or education-based human-capital accumulation on the individual level.
We offer as a hypothesis the possibility that present-day general fer
tility trends in affluent populations may be governed more by ideation
al developments that flow through societies as a whole than by an accu
mulation of effects of materialistic computations made independently b
y individual couples.