Purpose: The clinical utility of hippocampal volumetry is well documen
ted, but the materials and techniques required to perform the procedur
e are not widely available outside major research centers. We describe
a personal computer-based method of volumetric data analysis. Methods
: Using a 1.0-T scanner, we obtained 2-mm-thick tilted coronal MPRAGE
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 20 healthy volunteers aged 2
0-38 years. We used an inexpensive utility program to extract image in
formation and an NIH Image for image analysis. The hippocampal formati
ons were traced with a graphics tablet and landmarks described by Wats
on et al. (Neurology 1992;42:1743-50). Overlays of individual observer
s' tracings were used to fine tune the selection of landmarks and boun
daries. Filled-in silhouette pairs generated from these ''training tra
cings'' were compared to determine how well observers could visually q
uantify area differences. Results: Visual detection of asymmetry of si
lhouette pairs was sensitive, but the magnitude of asymmetry was under
estimated. We achieved intraobserver coefficients of variation of righ
t/left volume ratios between 0.82 and 3.16 and an interobserver range
of volume ratios of 6%. In 20 healthy controls aged 20-38 years, the m
ean right and left hippocampal volumes were 2,911 mm(3) and 2,836 mm(3
), respectively. The lower limits of normal were 2,217 mm(3) for the r
ight and 2,178 mm(3) for the left. The mean right/ left hippocampal ra
tio was 1.03, and the limits of normal (3 SD) for this were 0.95 to 1.
10. Conclusions: Hippocampal volumetry can be performed reliably and e
conomically. Our methodology makes it possible for different observers
to generate consistent and comparable measurements.