This paper describes and then analyzes the decision-making arrangement
s that prevail among the Raikas-nomadic shepherds from Western India.
The paper suggests, using a simple analytical framework, that the exis
ting distribution of decision-making during migration helps the Raikas
to utilize available economies of scale, represent the different inte
rest groups in their collectives, and control their decision-makers. A
t the same time, the ordinary shepherds in the camp are able to extrac
t a comfortable subsistence from a complex and harsh environment by de
legating much of their decision-making responsibilities to the leaders
in the camp. To the extent shepherds in other parts of the world migr
ate over long distances and must confront similar issues of delegation
of responsibilities and control over decision-makers, the analysis ho
lds general relevance.