THE USE OF A CASE REGISTER TO EVALUATE THE COSTS OF PSYCHIATRIC-CARE

Citation
F. Amaddeo et al., THE USE OF A CASE REGISTER TO EVALUATE THE COSTS OF PSYCHIATRIC-CARE, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95(3), 1997, pp. 189-198
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
ISSN journal
0001690X
Volume
95
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
189 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-690X(1997)95:3<189:TUOACR>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The aim of this study was to show the usefulness of adding cost inform ation to a routine data collection provided by a case register for ana lysing the association between patients' characteristics and the direc t costs of the psychiatric care actually provided. All patients (n = 7 06) who in 1992 had at least one contact with services which report to the South Verona psychiatric case register and who received an ICD-10 diagnosis were included in the study. The costs of specialist psychia tric care provided during the 365 days following the first contact in 1992 were calculated using a unit cost list. A bespoke software, linke d to the case register, was designed to produce the individual informa tion on costs directly. For each patient, costs were categorized as in -patient costs, sheltered accommodation costs, day-care costs, out-pat ient costs and community costs. All costs, grouped by service type, we re found to differ significantly (P < 0.01) between diagnostic groups (affective disorders, neurotic and somatoform disorders, schizophrenia and related disorders, and other diagnoses). The multivariate analyse s showed that costs are significantly higher for patients with a diagn osis of schizophrenia and related disorders than for patients belongin g to the other diagnostic groups. However, only 6% of the variation co uld be explained by diagnostic group alone. On the other hand, between 40 and 50% of the costs of mental health care was predicted by patien ts' personal characteristics and other measures recorded on the case r egister. The results of the present study show that, where service use is monitored regularly, the base from which decisions on community pr ovision and placement are made can be informed by careful analysis of routinely or easily available data on direct costs.