EFFECTS OF PRAVASTATIN ON APOLIPOPROTEIN-SPECIFIC HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBPOPULATIONS AND LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBCLASS PHENOTYPES IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
Mc. Cheung et al., EFFECTS OF PRAVASTATIN ON APOLIPOPROTEIN-SPECIFIC HIGH-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBPOPULATIONS AND LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBCLASS PHENOTYPES IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA, Atherosclerosis, 102(1), 1993, pp. 107-119
The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor class of cholesterol-lowering agents r
educes very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and low density lipoprotei
ns (LDL) and slightly increases high density lipoproteins (HDL). Howev
er, the effects of these agents on subclasses within the LDL and HDL f
ractions are not well understood. We have employed an HMG-CoA reductas
e inhibitor, pravastatin, to determine if LDL subclass phenotypes, as
determined by gradient gel electrophoresis, and HDL particles containi
ng both apolipoprotein (apo) A-I and A-II, Lp(AI w AII), and those con
taining apo A-I but not A-II, Lp(AI w/o AII) are affected by pravastat
in (10 mg daily). Twenty-four subjects with LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) >
160 mg/dl, triglyceride (TG) < 350 mg/dl and no recent myocardial infa
rction or secondary causes of hypercholesterolemia were enrolled. Comp
ared with an age- and sex-matched normolipidemic reference group (cont
rols), the hypercholesterolemic subjects had reduced levels of Lp(Al w
/o AII) and increased levels of Lp(AI w All) at baseline. In addition,
both of their HDL subpopulations had significantly more small (7.0-8.
2 nm) particles (P < 0.02 and 0.0001) but significantly fewer large (9
.2-11.2 nm) particles (P < 0.002 and 0.0001). Pravastatin induced stat
istically significant (P < 0.001) reductions in plasma total C (15%),
LDL-C (18%), and apo B (16%). While apo A-I and A-II levels increased
5% (P < 0.001) and 6% (P < 0.05), respectively, concentration, composi
tion, and size abnormalities in Lp(AI w AII) and Lp(AI w/o AII) persis
ted. Lp(a), apo E and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) levels
also did not change. Although changes in LDL subclass phenotypes were
observed, all changes involved the intermediate phenotype, and no sig
nificant changes in LDL peak particle diameter were seen in either gro
up. Interrelationships between CETP, LDL subclass phenotypes and HDL s
ubpopulations were also seen. Conclusions: Although pravastatin decrea
sed plasma apo B and LDL lipid concentrations, no major changes were s
een in LDL subclass phenotypes or HDL subpopulations even in the prese
nce of abnormalities associated with arteriosclerosis. Similarly, CETP
, which is believed to play a role in HDL and LDL particle size distri
bution, did not change with pravastatin treatment. Further research is
needed to determine the pathophysiological basis of abnormal HDL and
LDL subclasses in hypercholesterolemia and explore methods of rectifyi
ng the abnormalities.