Aims-To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and practicality of reco
mbinant proteins in serological tests for the detection of human parvo
virus B19 IgG and IgM. Method-Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent ass
ays using B19 structural proteins expressed in Escherichia coli were d
eveloped for the detection of B19 specific IgG and IgM (rELISA-G and r
ELISA-M). Cells infected with baculovirus expressing B19 structural pr
oteins were also used in an indirect immunofluorescence assay for IgG
and IgM antibodies (IFA-G and IFA-M). Antibody capture radioimmunoassa
ys for IgG and IgM (GACRIA and MACRIA) were used as comparative assays
.Results-Twenty nine pools of intravenous immunoglobulin were clearly
positive for B19 IgG by rELISA-G and contained low IgG titres by GACRI
A. From 113 samples tested by all methods, sensitivities of 92% (77/84
) and 97% (68/70) were obtained for ELISA and immunofluorescence, resp
ectively, when compared with GACRIA. One hundred and sixteen samples f
rom patients presenting with rash or arthralgia were compared by MACRI
A, rELISA-M, and IFA-M. Sensitivities of both recombinant tests were m
ore than 95%. Despite pre-treatment to remove IgG or rheumatoid factor
, false positive results were a problem in the rELISA-M but were not s
een with the IFA-M. Conclusions-The limited supply of native antigen h
as severely restricted the wide application of serology for parvovirus
B19. The use of recombinant antigens permitted the introduction of lo
cal screening tests which had many advantages, including quicker resul
ts and relief of the burden on the Reference Laboratory. The use of rE
LISA-M for sensitivity and IFA-M for specificity and confirmation prov
ed a useful and practical combination for diagnosis of recent infectio
n with B19, and rELISA-G allowed the immune response to be determined
in selected populations.