Gb. Tan et al., EVALUATION OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR ROUTINE ESTIMATION OF HEMOGLOBIN-A(2) AND HEMOGLOBIN-F, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 46(9), 1993, pp. 852-856
Aims-To compare high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with con
ventional methods for the estimation of blood haemoglobin A2 (HbA2) an
d haemoglobin F (HbF) concentrations in routine thalassaemia screening
. Methods-An HPLC system (the VARIANT Hemoglobin Testing System) was t
ested for precision and reproducibility in the measurement of HbA2 and
HbF, and reference ranges were obtained for a local healthy adult pop
ulation. HPLC was compared with column anion exchange chromatography f
or HbA2 measurement, and radial immunodiffusion, or alkaline denaturat
ion for HbF measurement. The reliability of HbA2 measurement by HPLC f
or the detection of beta thalassaemia and HbE was assessed in 200 cons
ecutive samples for routine thalassaemia screening. Results-HPLC was r
apid, technically easy, and gave good precision and reproducibility. I
n all comparisons linear regression analysis showed good correlation b
etween HbA2 or HbF concentrations determined by HPLC and by the respec
tive conventional methods. All beta thalassaemia or haemoglobin E carr
iers presumptively identified by conventional methods in 200 consecuti
ve samples were detected by HbA2 measurement using HPLC, without any f
alse positive or false negative results. Conclusions-The measurement o
f HbA2 and HbF by HPLC is rapid, reproducible, and precise. It is as r
eliable as column chromatography for the measurement of HbA2 and radia
l immunodiffusion or alkaline denaturation for the measurement of HbF.
HPLC may be an appropriate method for rapid screening in population s
urveys for beta thalassaemia and HbE carriers.