A number of alternative estimators for the coefficients of a Tobit mod
el have been proposed in the literature. The covariance matrix of ML e
stimates is typically associated with the algorithm applied to maximiz
e the likelihood. Covariance estimators used in practice are derived b
y: (1) the Hessian (observed information), (2) the matrix of outer pro
ducts of the first derivatives of the log-likelihood (OPG version), (3
) the expected Hessian (estimated information), (4) a mixture of (1) a
nd (2) (White's QML covariance matrix). Significant differences among
estimates are usually interpreted as an indication of misspecification
. From our Monte Carlo study this seems not to be true, unless the sam
ple size is really very large. Even in the absence of misspecification
, large differences are encountered in small samples, and the sign of
the differences is almost systematic. This suggests that the choice of
the covariance estimator is not neutral and the results of hypotheses
testing may be strongly affected by such a choice.