The purpose of this study was to compare the concurrent use of chloral
hydrate (CH), intramuscular Nembutal (IMN) and intravenous Nembutal (
IVN) for sedation. Data was collected on all pediatric outpatients req
uiring sedation for CT over a 2.5-year period. During this period, 217
8 outpatients required sedation of whom, 1324 (60.8%) received IMN, 71
0 (32.6%) IVN and 110 (5%) CH. The overall success rate was 97% and wa
s similar in all three groups. IVN however, produced better-quality se
dation than IMN or CH. The IVN group received a significantly lower do
se of Nembutal than the IMN group (p = 0.001). Patients receiving IVN
had a significantly lower induction time (p = 0.0001) and total examin
ation time (p = 0.001) than IMN or CH. There was an increased occurren
ce of desaturation in patients sedated with IVN, especially in those w
ith airway obstruction. IVN sedation permits faster, more efficient an
d better-quality sedation for outpatient CT scanning than IMN or CH in
patients requiring intravenous contrast but may not be appropriate fo
r departments that perform relatively few sedations or lack proper res
uscitation facilities.