Albert and Loewer[1] have recently clarified their earlier objection t
o the interactive interpretation presented in Healey[2]. They now char
ge that this interpretation fails to solve a problem of which the meas
urement problem is but a special case. The general problem is to recon
cile quantum mechanics with the prima facie determinateness of such dy
namical properties as the positions of macroscopic objects. In respons
e I defend both the preeminent significance of determinate measurement
outcomes and the claim that the models of Healey[3] go a long way tow
ard securing their determinateness.