The typical model of individual attitudes toward risk-to-life suggests
that an individual's willingness to pay for a reduction in mortality
risk increases with the baseline risk. The higher-baseline hypothesis
has been the subject of several empirical tests but results have so fa
r been mixed. Using survey evidence, we present a situation in which s
ubjects do prefer to reduce risks for which the baseline is higher. Th
is finding is robust to several alternative explanations. Survey respo
nses reflect subjects' concerns about government effectiveness in risk
reduction, environmental effects associated with the various hazards,
and other idiosyncratic elements of the risks; however, these concern
s appear to occur in addition to, not in lieu of, the preference to re
duce higher risks.