Titanium (ASTM F76) samples received three different surface treatment
s after which the resulting oxides were characterized and the corrosio
n behavior was evaluated. No differences in the corrosion potential (E
(corr) were observed for the non-passivated and passivated Ti samples.
However, the anodized Ti samples exhibited a significantly more noble
E(corr). At potentials higher than E(corr), significant differences i
n current densities were observed for all three different Ti surfaces,
with lower current densities observed for anodized Ti samples as comp
ared to the non-passivated and passivated Ti samples. X-ray photoelect
ron spectroscopy indicated predominantly TiO2 on all Ti surfaces, with
a higher concentration of carboxyl species for the anodized Ti surfac
es as compared to the non-passivated and passivated Ti surfaces. Auger
electron spectroscopy revealed a 10-fold thicker oxide layer for anod
ized Ti surfaces as compared to non-passivated and passivated Ti surfa
ces.