OBJECTIVE - To compare three glucose meters modified for use by indivi
duals with diabetes and visual impairment regarding accuracy, precisio
n, and clinical reliability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Ten subject
s with diabetes and visual impairment performed self-monitoring of blo
od glucose using each of the three commercially available blood glucos
e meters modified for visually impaired users (the AccuChek Freedom [B
oehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), the Diascan SVM [Home Diagnosti
cs, Eatontown, NJ], and the One Touch [Lifescan, Milpitas, CA]). The m
eters were independently evaluated by a laboratory technologist for pr
ecision and accuracy determinations. RESULTS- Only two meters were acc
eptable with regard to laboratory precision (coefficient of variation
< 10%)-the Accuchek and the One Touch. The Accuchek and the One Touch
did not differ significantly with regard to laboratory estimates of ac
curacy. A great discrepancy of the clinical reliability results was ob
served between these two meters. The Accuchek maintained a high degree
of reliability (y = 0.99X + 0.44, r = 0.97, P = 0.001). The visually
impaired subjects were unable to perform reliable testing using the On
e Touch system because of a lack of appropriate tactile landmarks and
auditory signals. CONCLUSIONS - In addition to laboratory assessments
of glucose meters, monitoring systems designed for the visually impair
ed must include adequate tactile and audible feedback features to allo
w for the acquisition and placement of appropriate blood samples.