L. Markson et al., THE DOCTORS ROLE IN DISCUSSING ADVANCE PREFERENCES FOR END-OF-LIFE CARE - PERCEPTIONS OF PHYSICIANS PRACTICING IN THE VA, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(4), 1997, pp. 399-406
OBJECTIVES: Although previous studies have shown physicians support ad
vance directives, little is known about how they actually participate
in decision-making. This study investigates (1) hew much experience ph
ysicians have had discussing and following advance preferences and (2)
how physicians perceive their role in the advance decision-making pro
cess. DESIGN: Mail survey conducted in 1993. SETTING: The Department o
f Veterans Affairs. PARTICIPANTS: A national probability sample of 105
0 VA internists, family physicians, and generalists. MEASUREMENTS AND
MAIN RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 67% of participants. In
the last year, 79% stated they had discussed advance preferences with
at least one patient, and 19% had talked to more than 25. Seventy-thre
e percent had used a written directive to make decisions for at least
one incompetent patient. Younger age, board certification, spending le
ss time in the outpatient setting, and personal experience with advanc
e decision-making, were all associated independently with having advan
ce preference discussions. Among physicians who had discussions, 59% s
aid they often initiated the discussion, 55% said discussions often oc
curred in inpatient settings, and 31% said discussions often occurred
in outpatient settings. Eighty-two percent of those responding thought
physicians should be responsible for initiating discussions. Most wou
ld try to persuade a patient to change a decision that was not well in
formed (91%), not medically reasonable (88%), or not in the patient's
best interest (88%); few would attempt to change decisions that confli
cted with their own moral beliefs (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians repor
t that they are actively involved with their patients in making decisi
ons about end-of-life care. Most say they have had recent discussions
with at least some of their patients and feel that as physicians they
should play a large and important role in soliciting and shaping patie
nt preferences.