W. Dalbey et al., REDUCING THE NUMBER OF RABBITS IN EYE AND SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS, Journal of the American College of Toxicology, 12(4), 1993, pp. 347-357
Reduction in the number of rabbits used for acute testing of irritatio
n in the eye and skin is a worthwhile goal, and some recent publicatio
ns have supported such reduction from six to three animals. In anticip
ation of making such reductions in our laboratory, data from 185 eye a
nd 179 skin irritation tests performed in-house were evaluated within
the framework of several schemes of classification. Mean scores for ir
ritation in all possible two, three, four, and five-rabbit subsets wer
e compared to scores with all six rabbits. Parameters included mean we
ighted Draize scores (eye) and Occupational Safety and Health Administ
ration (OSHA) primary irritation index (skin). Classification of irrit
ants is often based on scales with two or more categories of relative
severity (e.g., nonirritating, mild, moderate, severe). Therefore, irr
itation scores of each subset were grouped into two, three,four, or ri
ve categories of irritation. Overall agreement of rankings for the sub
sets was closer to rankings with six rabbits when fewer categories wer
e used with greater numbers of animals in the subset. Mean agreement a
cross all categories was >90% with three rabbits and four categories f
or both eye and skin irritation. However, agreement within a given cat
egory across subsets was best with nonirritants and least among irrita
nts; eye irritants with mean weighted Draize scores of 16-35 had only
approximately 76% agreement with 3 rabbits/subset. Comparisons were al
so made between subsets of three rabbits and the original six rabbits
using both the European Community (EC) system of mean values for eve i
rritation and the OSHA system based on the number of individuals with
''positive'' scores. Agreement was better with the EC system. To maint
ain accuracy within the framework of American guidelines, our laborato
ry will continue to use six rabbits for regulatory studies. Other inve
stigators should carefully evaluate the effect on accuracy of results
before reducing the numbers of animals used per acute study.